“Do Not Go to Cirith Ungol!” Some Further Thoughts on an Impossible Decision.

The Two Towers by J.R.R Tolkien (Harper Collins 1991, 2007) pp. 904-907

I have read this passage from The Lord of the Rings many times over the last fifty years or so and I don’t think I ever quite realised before the pivotal role that it plays in the whole story. Frodo has come to trust Faramir and here this noble figure is offering him safety and the chance to be free completely of the malicious character that is Gollum.

Tolkien reflected on this in a letter that he wrote to Michael Straight early in 1956, replying to a number of questions that Straight had asked him before writing a review for New Republic and he did so in terms of the 6th petition of The Lords Prayer, “Lead us not into temptation”. (The Letters of J.R.R Tolkien Harper Collins 2006 pp. 232-237).

Tolkien compared this petition with the 7th, “But deliver us from evil” and commented that the 6th is both harder and less often considered. Tolkien writes that “the ‘salvation’ of the world and Frodo’s own salvation is achieved by his previous pity and forgiveness of injury. At any point any prudent person would have told Frodo that Gollum would certainly betray him, and could rob him in the end. To ‘pity’ him, to forbear to kill him, was a piece of folly, or a mystical belief in the ultimate value-in-itself of pity and generosity even if disastrous in the world of time”.

So, when Faramir, the “prudent person” says to Frodo that if he chooses to abandon Gollum he will have Gollum escorted to any point on the borders of Gondor that Gollum might name, Frodo replies “I have promised many times to take him under my protection and to go where he led.” Frodo cannot break faith even though it is folly to keep it. Utter folly.

See how Kryztov Marczak imagines the chaos in Shelob’s Lair below the Tower of Cirith Ungol. The path that Frodo must take.

As we saw last week Frodo goes through with Faramir the options that are available to him. To return to the Black Gate is simply impossible and there is no-one apart from Gollum who could guide him into Mordor. And what of returning with Faramir to Minas Tirith?

“Would you have me come to Gondor with this Thing, the Thing that drove your brother mad with desire? What spell would it work in Minas Tirith? Shall there be two cities of Minas Morgul, grinning at each other across a dead land filled with rottenness?”

At the last Faramir respondes with the only words upon which both he and Frodo can agree completely.

“It is a hard doom and a hopeless errand.”

But Faramir hopes, beyond hope, that one day he and Frodo might sit “by a wall in the sun, laughing at old grief”. The thought is a tender one and one can only hope that both Frodo and Faramir were comforted from time to time by it on the hard roads that each of them were to take in the weeks ahead, roads that were to take both of them to the verge of death and then to new life beyond them. The Lord of the Rings does not recount these happy conversations but in other writings Tolkien speaks of times like this and we can only hope that the two heroes were able to enjoy one another’s company in this way.

Both Frodo and Faramir have to make choices that are folly. Faramir allows Frodo to go free, bearing the Ring of Power, in the company of a treacherous guide, into Mordor itself. His father cannot forgive him for this and we must think that he dies unreconciled with his son. Frodo goes on with Gollum and is betrayed by him in Shelob’s Lair in Cirith Ungol and attacked and wounded by him in the Cracks of Doom; and Frodo has to live in the knowledge that at the end he did not have the strength to cast away the Ring and was only saved by Gollum’s attack. But both make their choice in freedom in Henneth Annûn. As Tolkien reflected in his letter to Michael Straight, Frodo’s choice (and we must add, Faramir’s also) is a “piece of folly”. But Tolkien also opens the possibility that Frodo’s decision not to kill, or even abandon, Gollum has a mystical quality to it. This quality comes from the belief that any act of goodness has meaning in eternity “even if disastrous in the world of time”. In The Lord of the Rings this eternal quality breaks into the story at the moment when Gollum takes the Ring into the Fire to unmake it. In the stories in which we live we cannot tell what consequences our own choices for goodness will have. Perhaps we will only see disaster in the world of time but we are called to choose the good anyway and to trust.

6 thoughts on ““Do Not Go to Cirith Ungol!” Some Further Thoughts on an Impossible Decision.

  1. Wonderful! Really, none of us can know all ends, but we still have to
    act. On what do we base our decisions? Frodo is following an unchanging
    principle of ultimate good despite not knowing how things will turn out.
    Thanks for this insight!
    Kate

    • Thank you, Kate. That moment when Frodo first meets Gollum and says, “Now that I see him I do pity him”, as he remembers his conversation with Gandalf in his study at Bag End is perhaps the moment upon which the whole story turns.

  2. Thanks for this beautiful reflection! I think this is another instance of how Tolkien weaves the message of 1 Corinthians 1:18-29 as a central theme into Lord of the Rings. “For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God…Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?…we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God…God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise.” We see Tolkien emphasize this distinction many times throughout the book: that what appears to the world as “folly” is actually wisdom and what appears to be “wise” is actually folly. At the Council: between Gandalf and Erestor discussing folly vs. wisdom. In Lothlorien, between Celeborn and Galadriel discussing Gandalf’s fall and the wisdom to do what is necessary. In Minas Tirith when Denethor calls Gandalf’s hope in Frodo a fool’s hope (i.e., folly). Boromir also calls the Fellowship’s ultimate goal folly – alluding to it in Lothlorien and then again at Parth Galen when trying to take the Ring from Frodo. On Mt. Doom itself when Sauron realizes his peril, his “wise” strategems and deceits are suddenly described by the narrator as his “folly.”

    • Thank you for all these reflections. Others have also commented that Tolkien must have been inspired by the thoughts of St Paul to which you refer. I am sure that this must be the case although I have not found a specific reference. If you know one please let me know. I have recently been struck by thoughts expressed by Malcolm Guite. Tolkien does not preach at his readers. He just tells me story. There is much wisdom in that.

      • I haven’t found a direct confirmation of influence for that specific passage, but I have made, what I believe to be a fairly strong case (here: https://thoughtsontolkien.wordpress.com/2023/11/05/wisdom-and-folly-in-lord-of-the-rings/) that the blending of the Corinthian themes of 1) worldly wisdom being folly and worldly folly being wisdom and 2) the exaltation of the weak at the expense of the strong – is at minimum present subconsciously. The closest thing to a direct Biblical link on this may be Tolkien’s Letter 163, in which he specifically links the hobbits’ storyline to the Magnificat, which has similar themes to Corinthians, but of course is not any evidence Tolkien had the Corinthians passage in mind.

        I agree that I don’t think Tolkien would have intended to preach in his writing – it’s one of the things he strongly disliked in other writers.

Leave a comment